Thursday, December 3, 2009

Peacepipes say's "the spectre of spending time behind bars is haunting this idiot(Bainimarama) very badly"

Its the same old same old talk and no action or response whatsoever. Every right thinking person or group are calling for restoration of democracy but Frank and his goon won't give an inch. He is there for the long haul even if the country goes under in the process. We all know that there is a hell of a lot for him to lose if he gives in.
 
 And the spectre of spending time behind bars is haunting this idiot very badly. No amount of compromise will get him to yield power as he seem damned committed to saving his own skin and to continue harvesting the rapidly declining government coffers. So too must the two Evelis be able to replenish their empty bank accounts reason why they are on this bandwagon.
 
All should by now realise that talk is not the answer to dealing with this foolish criminal. For the sake of ordinary people in Fiji more drastic and effective measures should be enforced to get him to relent on his stand on the matter.
 
 We should get us a lobbyist to contact all international organisation not to deal with or recognise the current military regime since they criminally grabbed govt by the barrel of the gun and do not have the mandate or legitimacy to rule over the people of Fiji. Enough of the bullshit.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Why top nations are now interested on our oil?

"The Hubbert Curve is used to predict the rate of production from an
oil producing region containing many individual wells. Source:
aspoitalia.net

In the 1950s the well known U.S. geologist M. King Hubbert was working
for Shell Oil. He noted that oil discoveries graphed over time tended
to follow a bell shape curve. He supposed that the rate of oil
production would follow a similar curve, now known as the Hubbert
Curve (see figure). In 1956 Hubbert predicted that production from the
US lower 48 states would peak between 1965 and 1970. Despite efforts
from his employer to pressure him into not making his projections
public, the notoriously stubborn Hubbert did so anyway. In any case,
most people inside and outside the industry quickly dismissed the
predictions. As it happens, the US lower 48 oil production did peak in
1970/1. In that year, by definition, US oil producers had never
produced as much oil, and Hubbert's predictions were a fading memory.

The peak was only acknowledged with the benefit of several years of hindsight.
No oil producing region fits the bell shaped curve exactly because
production is dependent on various geological, economic and political
factors, but the Hubbert Curve remains a powerful predictive tool.

In retrospect, the U.S. oil peak might be seen as the most significant
geopolitical event of the mid to late 20th Century, creating the
conditions for the energy crises of the 1970s, leading to far greater
U.S. strategic emphasis on controlling foreign sources of oil, and
spelling the beginning of the end of the status of the U.S. as the
world's major creditor nation. The U.S. of course, was able to import
oil from elsewhere. Mounting debt has allowed life to continue in the
U.S. with only minimal interruption so far. When global oil production
peaks, the implications will be felt far more widely, and with much
more force.

So when will oil peak globally?

Later in life M. King Hubbert predicted a global oil peak between 1995
and 2000. He may have been close to the mark, except that the oil
shocks of the 1970s slowed the growth of our use of oil.
As represented in the following figure, global oil discovery peaked in
the late 1960s. Since the mid-1980s, oil companies have been finding
less oil than we have been consuming.

Of the 65 largest oil producing countries in the world, up to 54 have
passed their peak of production and are now in decline, including the
USA in 1970, Indonesia in 1997, Australia in 2000, the UK in 1999,
Norway in 2001, and Mexico in 2004. Hubbert's methods, as well as
other methodologies, have been used to make various projections about
the global oil peak, with results ranging from 'already peaked', to
the very optimistic 2035″

http://www.energybulletin.net

The goons continue to receive higher allocation than the Agriculture ministry

Thanks Nostra, but apart from tourism the goons continue to receive
higher allocation than the Agriculture ministry and yet this
government's buzz word is to develop the agriculture sector to boost
exports, blah! blah! blah! And here goes Cokanasiga, being one of the
"yes" old man says that he is satisfied with the allocation……sorry but
this is just my very simple view without going into any analysis….I am
still so pissed! Yes and I support your thoughts Nostra, buying
support more like it is the hidden motive of this budget, and with the
mentality of the current day populace….this will surely go down well
wid them. As for the goons, don't actually know what they do towards
nation building except for raping and intimidating us like we were in
a third world country…..but we are getting there!!!!

It is a waste of money putting any money into tourism as long as the military is in power

It is a waste of money putting any money into tourism as long as the
military is in power.
Besides that, tourism is private sector. If the politics are right,
tourism will be booming on the basis of foreign and local private
sector investment alone. The role of the government is to make sure
the roads are repaired, immigration procedures are streamlined, and
that the local people are well educated and happy (smiling).

I am not making an argument for financial support for the army.
Government money should be spent on education, health, infrastructure,
etc, not for a bunch of useless goons with guns who have no role but
to intimidate the rights away from the rest of the People.
Frank tries to make things look rosy not by developing the nation and
the people, but by stifling any criticism so his supporters can
falsely think that he is doing well.

Nostra